When Can Deposits be Forfeited: Rights and Remedies for Buyers and Sellers

Deposits are a common feature in commercial transactions across various industries, serving as a commitment from the buyer and protecting the seller against financial risks if the buyer defaults. However, the concept of deposit forfeiture can be complex, with legal principles governing when a deposit can be forfeited and the remedies available to both buyers and sellers.

This article will provide a comprehensive overview of deposit forfeiture in commercial transactions, explaining the legal framework, the circumstances under which deposits can be forfeited, and the rights and remedies available to buyers and sellers. By understanding these key aspects, business owners, property developers, and lawyers can navigate deposit forfeiture issues more effectively and make informed decisions in commercial transactions.

Understanding Deposit Forfeiture in Commercial Transactions

A deposit forfeiture occurs when a buyer defaults on a contract and loses their deposit to the seller. In commercial transactions, deposits serve as a form of security and commitment between parties.

The Role of Deposits in Contracts of Sale

Deposits act as an earnest payment to secure the performance of the contract. The standard deposit amount is typically 10% of the purchase price, which courts recognise as a reasonable pre-estimate of a seller’s potential losses if the buyer defaults.

When a deposit is paid, it is usually held by a third party, such as a lawyer or real estate agent, in trust until settlement occurs. This prevents sellers from unreasonably holding onto deposits and protects both parties’ interests during the transaction.

Legal Principles Governing Deposit Forfeiture

Two key legal principles govern deposit forfeiture:

• A deposit serves as security for contract performance
• The law will not enforce penalties for contract breaches

These principles generally coexist because a 10% deposit is considered a genuine pre-estimate of losses rather than a penalty. Courts have consistently upheld a seller’s right to retain a 10% deposit upon buyer default.

If a deposit exceeds 10%, courts may view the excess amount as an unenforceable penalty. For example, in a recent NSW Supreme Court case, a contract requiring an additional 10% deposit (total of 20%) was scrutinised, with the court focusing on whether this constituted a penalty.

When Can Deposits Be Forfeited?

Deposits can be forfeited in commercial transactions under specific circumstances where a breach of contract justifies the forfeiture. The key situations that may lead to deposit forfeiture include:

Default and Breach of Contract

A buyer’s default or breach of the contract terms can result in the forfeiture of their deposit. Common examples of default or breach include:

• Failing to complete the purchase by the agreed-upon settlement date
• Not fulfilling conditions precedent, such as obtaining finance approval or necessary permits
• Withdrawing from the contract without a valid legal reason

If the buyer defaults or breaches the contract in a way that justifies termination, the seller may be entitled to forfeit the deposit as compensation for their losses and the lost opportunity to sell to another party.

Non-Refundable Deposits and Their Implications

In some cases, a contract may specify that a deposit is “non-refundable.” This means that if the buyer fails to complete the purchase, they will forfeit the deposit regardless of the reason. However, the enforceability of such clauses depends on whether they constitute a genuine pre-estimate of the seller’s loss.

If a non-refundable deposit is excessive and disproportionate to the seller’s actual or anticipated losses, it may be considered a penalty and be unenforceable. Courts will assess the fairness and reasonableness of non-refundable deposit clauses on a case-by-case basis.

It’s important to note that even if a deposit is specified as non-refundable, there may be limited circumstances where the buyer can seek relief against forfeiture, such as when the seller has engaged in misleading or unconscionable conduct.

Relief Against Forfeiture

When a buyer defaults on a contract and forfeits their deposit, they may seek relief from the courts to have the deposit returned. This is known as relief against forfeiture, and it is a discretionary remedy that courts can grant in certain circumstances.

Court’s Discretion in Granting Relief

Courts have the power to grant relief against forfeiture if they believe it would be unfair or inequitable for the seller to keep the deposit. This discretion is exercised on a case-by-case basis, taking into account the specific facts and circumstances of each situation.

Some key factors that courts consider when deciding whether to grant relief include:

• The conduct of both parties leading up to the default
• The reasons for the buyer’s default
• The amount of the deposit in relation to the purchase price
• Whether the seller has suffered any actual loss due to the default

For example, if a buyer defaults due to genuine hardship or unforeseen circumstances, and the deposit represents a significant portion of the purchase price, a court may be more inclined to grant relief. On the other hand, if the buyer wilfully breaches the contract or the seller has incurred substantial losses, relief is less likely.

Factors Influencing Court Decisions

When determining whether to exercise their discretion to grant relief against forfeiture, courts will weigh a range of factors, including:

1. Proportionality: Is the deposit amount reasonable and proportionate to the seller’s legitimate interests and potential losses? Deposits that are excessive or punitive are more likely to warrant relief.
   
2. Cause of default: Was the buyer’s default due to wilful misconduct or unavoidable circumstances? Defaults caused by bad faith or gross negligence are less likely to justify relief compared to defaults caused by unforeseeable events or hardship.
   
3. Prejudice to the seller: Has the seller suffered any significant detriment, lost opportunities, or wasted expenditures due to the buyer’s default? The greater the seller’s losses, the less likely relief will be granted.
   
4. Timing of the default: Did the default occur early in the transaction process or close to settlement? Late-stage defaults may weigh against relief if the seller has already taken steps in reliance on the contract.
   
5. Windfall to the seller: Would allowing the forfeiture result in the seller receiving a substantial windfall compared to their actual losses? Courts aim to avoid unjust enrichment.
   

Ultimately, courts strive to balance the competing interests of buyers and sellers. The goal is to uphold contractual bargains while preventing unfair or unconscionable outcomes. By carefully examining the circumstances of each case, courts can determine whether relief against forfeiture is necessary to achieve a just result.

Recovery Options for Buyers

When a deposit has been forfeited, buyers have several potential avenues for recovery. The specific options available depend on the circumstances of the forfeiture and the terms of the contract.

Legal Avenues for Deposit Recovery

Buyers can pursue legal action to recover their deposits through various claims. A buyer may challenge the forfeiture if there was misrepresentation by the seller about the material aspects of the transaction. Courts may grant relief against forfeiture in exceptional circumstances, particularly if the deposit amount exceeds 10% of the purchase price.

The court has discretion under section 55(2A) of the Conveyancing Act 1919 to order the return of a deposit if it thinks fit. This broad discretion allows courts to consider factors such as:

• Whether the vendor acted harshly or unfairly
• If retaining the deposit would give the vendor an unwarranted windfall
• The proportionality of the deposit to the potential loss
• Whether there were exceptional circumstances warranting relief

Negotiating Refunds and Settlements

Before pursuing legal action, buyers may attempt to negotiate directly with sellers for the return of their deposit. When negotiating, buyers should:

• Document all communications with the seller
• Present evidence of any mitigating circumstances
• Consider offering a partial settlement
• Propose mediation as an alternative to litigation

The success of negotiations often depends on maintaining professional communication and having supporting documentation to justify the request for a refund. For example, if a buyer spends considerable sums on development applications, this may strengthen their negotiating position.

Conclusion

Deposit forfeiture in commercial transactions involves complex legal principles that affect both buyers and sellers. The courts recognise a 10% deposit as a reasonable pre-estimate of loss, allowing vendors to retain this amount if a purchaser defaults. However, attempts to forfeit deposits exceeding 10% may be deemed an unenforceable penalty.

While vendors have established rights to forfeit deposits in cases of buyer default, courts maintain discretion to grant relief against forfeiture in exceptional circumstances. This discretion balances protecting vendors’ legitimate interests with preventing unfair outcomes, particularly where factors like substantial improvements to the property or disproportionate losses are involved.

We’re here to support you—schedule your consultation now.

Frequently Asked Questions